No Limit: A Search for the American Dream on the Poker Tournament Trail
Last night I got to see a special "industry preview" of an indy flick with a really long title. I had high hopes for the film for three reasons: it was (1) a documentary (2) about poker (3) for an exclusive audience. Unfortunately, it missed the mark on all three points.
- My favorite documentaries are those that follow people who take their absurd lives seriously (American Movie, Trekkies, Tribute, Grizzly Man, Spellbound, March of the Penguins). From the description, I thought this movie wouldn't disappoint. It follows a filmmaker as she tries to raise money for her production company by entering high-stakes poker tournaments. I had visions of her selling camera equipment to finance her entry fees and ruining every relationship she's ever had to make her American Dream come true. Instead, they film this woman as she enters $500 tournaments at the Four Queens casino in downtown Las Vegas (never heard of the Four Queens casino? exactly). Not that I'm a high roller, but a $500 buy in is hardly high-stakes poker. But that's neither here nor there. My point is that her life was not absurd or even remotely interesting. Bitching about "bad luck" at 10 different low grade poker tournaments is far from entertaining.
- So I guess that leads me into missing the mark on point number 2 - poker. In case you hadn't noticed, I play poker every once and a while. I was looking forward to the insights of the many pro players they interviewed on the road. Unfortunately, the movie was filmed from 2003-2004, in the beginning of the "poker explosion." As it turns out, poker has actually evolved a lot in two years and so the interviews seemed really outdated. As you know, the JennChantal Patented Movie Review Rating System was put into place to help you, my Dear Fans, figure out which movies you should bother seeing - I recognize that not all of my Dear Fans actually like, understand, or play poker. With that in mind, I could not - in good conscious - give this film a good rating. The mark of a good documentary (which I guess goes back to point 1 - I'm a little all over the place today) is when it can take unfamiliar or seemingly uninteresting subject matter and make it fascinating for the viewer (Word Wars, Dogtown and Z Boys, Hoop Dreams). Unfortunately, this movie will not turn the average person onto poker any more than any poorly produced GSN poker show would.
- And finally - I was told I was going to an "industry viewing" and other than seeing poker pro (and boyfriend to Jennifer Tilly) Phil "the Unibomber" Laacke - the audience seemed to be filled with the film-maker's family members. JennChantal demands exclusivity!
For that reason - I'm giving the movie the JennChantal Patented "Find Something Better to Do" washing machine rating. And with that, I'm off to go see a "sneak preview" of Borat: The Movie. Keep your fingers crossed that the audience isn't filled with Grandma and Grandpa Baron Cohens.
Click here for the JennChantal Patented Movie Review Rating System.
2006 has been a slow movie-going year. Failure to Launch, The Shaggy Dog, She's the Man, and Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector are all currently in the Box Office Top 10. If it weren't for
What's the difference between a Rated-R comedy and PG-13? Sophisticated plot? Intelligent humor? No. As it turns out, the only difference between the two is that Rated-R movies can describe the female genitalia using a more diverse vocabulary.
cabbage-eating poor. And then Charlie finds a golden ticket - just one of five - in his Willy Wonka Chocolate Bar. The prize is that he and his grandfather get to take a tour of Mr. Wonka's extraordinary chocolate factory. The other golden ticket winners aren't as pure of heart as Charlie is, so they don't fare so well at the factory. But most importantly, there are oompa loompas. Creepy, orange-faced, green-haired,
oompa loompas, they were digitally rendered. One guy, reproduced thousands of times over. But horror of horrors - HE WASN'T EVEN A REAL 